Member comment
Brentwood, I think you misunderstand. First, the idea specifically says:
"While some apps might have a small charge, many or most would be free."
Second, I'd suggest that it shouldn't/wouldn't be the government that would receive any money for apps - it would be the developers of the apps. In this way, recovery.gov can build an environment that can easily connect developers who can work to provide specific views of recovery data with the people who need to consume it.
But in general, I think the app store metaphor is best for the idea of having a wide range of targeted applications, not so much for the "pay to use" aspect.
Comment from
LeeFeigenbaum
at
Cambridge Semantics
on
Apr 28, 2009