You are here: Home Ideas Accessibility to Data Generated by Recovery.gov
 

Jump into the discussion

Here's a question to get you started:

What sites or programs do you think do an excellent job aggregating and visualizing data for users? What is good about what they do?

Accessibility to Data Generated by Recovery.gov

idea

What is the idea?

All information should be readily accessible for everyone, including people with disabilities. Adherence to accessibility standards defined in Section 508 and the Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) should be considered opportunities, not impediments to presenting data on Recovery.gov. For example, adding closed captioning/timed transcripts to video allows all viewers to search based on text. Also, adding XSL to raw data allows a wider audience to read and understand information that would normally be avoided. Many of the same techniques that make a site more accessible to assistive technology used by people with disabilities also make the information more machine processable. Just by following open standards like using valid XHTML will help avoid missteps and aggravation in making content accessible. And, although not a technical issue, please use simple and direct language in public documents.
While the current Recovery.gov site presents accessibility barriers and does not follow the standards it claims to follow such as XHTML, the National Dialogue site is much closer to the goal of being accessible. To help with making the Recovery.gov site more usable and valuable, we recommend the following steps:

  1. Abide by open and accessibility standards starting in the design phase through completion. Define the standard used (we recommend WCAG 2.0 AA).
  2. Provide human readable documentation when practicable to explain all posted data.
  3. Use authoring tools when practicable that enforce standards and accessibility.
  4. Audit all content that is made public to ensure that it is accessible.
  5. Include a representation in all distributed and published material that it is accessible, preferably with an active link to test the representation so viewers can easily test for themselves.

Also there are some lightweight standards that will help with the public's ability to comment on and reuse content presented on Recovery.gov and Data.gov.

  • Use simple web addresses for each and every page, including pages with raw data (see Cool URL's and avoid using "?q=content" in the site's URLs). This will allow the public to more easily cite Recovery.gov information in their own web sites, blogs and communications. In long documents, use anchor tags.
  • Avoid iframes.
  • Like Wikipedia, use simple XHTML with "id" and "class" attributes that will help avoid CSS problems and make the content more machine accessible.
  • When possible, avoid locking up text in graphics and depending on alt tags. Note that downloadable fonts are now possible in most browsers with graceful degradation to standard fonts for other browsers (see CSS font-face).
  • Always link to referenced laws, regulations and other government sites as practicable.
  • Be especially careful when creating a public dialogue to avoid technologies that are inaccessible. Dialogues that take place in real time are more difficult and should require extra care. Consider allowing the public to self publish their own comments with embedded links to the relevant part of the Recovery Act and/or Recovery.gov site (see OPIA ).

Why is it important?

Making information accessible should be considered a great opportunity for Recovery.gov.

Daniel Bennett of advocatehope.org

and

Sharron Rush, Executive Director, of Knowbility

Submitted by citizencontact from advocatehope.org (Consulting) on Apr 30, 2009

This idea is now closed to further comments.

Current number of stars: 4
based on 20 votes
Tags:

6 Comments

Member comment

Having worked on content accessibility on many federal and federally-funded properties I have had the unadulterated joy of trying to make contentual properties that conform to the spirit of the law (WCAG WAI) and the letter of the law (Section 508). It is my opinion that content accessibility starts with the author, the publishing of content to the Web is the last step in a very long process. All federally-funded sites are already required to comply with Section 508, for better or for worse, and therefore what we should be asking for is more accountability for those who do not comply with the law. Separately, it may be a useful conversation to consider adopting international standards from the W3C instead of the current portions of 508 that can, in my experience, impede the accessibility of content.

Comment from JazMichaelKing on Apr 30, 2009
Member comment

Equal access to government information and services is the right of every citizen, regardless of disability. The tools and techniques are readily available to make it so.  I urge the planners at recovery.gov to make accessibility a foundational principle. 

Comment from Sharron at Knowbility.org on Apr 30, 2009
Member comment

On the ratings scale, is 1 or 5 best? I am blind, so may have missed some cues on the page. I wouldn't want to give this idea a low rating!...

Comment from pjburke3000 at UCLA, Disab. & Computing on Apr 30, 2009
Member comment

Congratulations, this website has just registered another visually impaired citizen.

However, I had considerable difficulty finding the comment box.  Are the formatting options necessary?

 

Suggestion: Avoid PDF whenever HTML is possible. People like me read PDF context as text, which usually looses its structure on its way to PDF. HTML constructs usually work better with a screen reader.

 

Suggestion: Follow the alpha-beta model of release of website documents. Gather a corps of persons with various disabilities and assistive tools to test website content for accessibility and clarity. I'll sign up.

 

This is an ultra-important topic. The U.S.G. needs at least one model of best practice to inspire other website's as well as the so many (billions) of public and private website's that could use a makeover. This is a great educational moment for all citizens and organizations to learn about web publishing. And each of the fixes for accessibility has a rationale that applies to everybody, thinking of the "curb cut" principle.  This dialog is off to a great start.

Comment from slger123 at apodder.org on Apr 30, 2009
Member comment

Good work in laying out some general methods and strategies for improving accessibility of Recovery.gov - and thanks.

I have gone over a few very specific accessibility problems on that site here: http://jimthatcher.com/recovery.htm.

On a couple of comments and questions here:

  1. 5 stars is best.
  2. About 508 vs WCAG and international standards - We will have 508 accessibility standards which are consisetent with WCAG 2.0 and internatinal standards. They have been drafted and we await the Access Board release of the final rule for public comment. See http://www.webaim.org/teitac/

 

Comment from JimThatcher on May 01, 2009
Member comment

Accessibility to the data does not mean that the data is understandable to the viewer.  What is the meaning of the data, in a given context?  The semantics of the data, available by following a terminology development method, helps to ensure the data is understood.

Comment from RoyERoebuck at One World Information System on May 02, 2009